bike - Bicycle sharing system
Photograph by Amanda Truss /clashon Flickr.
This model requires less repair as the users tend to care for bike Bike song the bikes as their own. In the UK, OYBike is currently delivering small-scale operations which may grow to this scale organically at 2 Universities, 3 Business Parks, and 3 London Boroughs (and a Hotel chain in London).
Montreal began a limited pilot project of Bixi bike-sharing bicycles in fall 2008. Some of the systems use mobile phones to reserve or sign out bikes. These programs allow usually for a longer rental time of up to 24 or 48 hours and as well for tourist and round trips.
The LibraryBikes.org program of the City of Arcata, California has loaned over 4000 bicycles with this system. In a national-level programme which combines a typical rental system with several of the above system types, a passenger railway operator or infrastructure manager partners with a national cycling organization and others to create a system closely connected with public transport. Individuals registered with the program identify themselves with their membership card (or a smart card, via cell phone, etc) at any of the hubs to check out a bicycle for a short period of time, usually less than two hours.
Several European cities, including the French cities of Lyon and Paris as well as London, Barcelona and Stockholm, have signed contracts with private advertising agencies (JCDecaux in Brussels, Lyon, Paris and Seville; Clear Channel in Stockholm, Barcelona, Perpignan and Zaragoza) that supply the city with thousands of bicycles free of charge (or for a minor fee). Bikes are also being locked to the Velib stands in Paris because no system can yet offer the option of reserving a bike for a return journey, and balancing flows can give problems as at Montmartre where special measures are needed to get bikes back to higher points at the top of the hill. Some car park operators such as Vinci Park in France lend bikes to their customers who park a car. The earliest community bicycle program, or at least the most legendary, was started in the 1960s by Luud Schimmelpenninck in association with the radical group Provo in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Secondly, many programs paint over the brand name and other distinguishing features of the bicycle, some even going so far as to paint every component such as the pedals, shifters, and wheels. Velo v introduced a number of innovations that were later copied by Velib and most other systems, including electronic locks, smart cards, telecommunication systems and on board computers. The current popularity of bike sharing is attributed by many to Paris successful launching in 2007 of Vélib’, a network of 20,000 specially designed bicycles distributed among 1450 stations throughout Paris.
The scheme is funded by commercial sponsors. At its height over 400 members could sign out a bike from any hub for up to 3 days.
Helsinki has a similar scheme, using bicycles available at over 26 stands for a €2 deposit, which is refundable at any other stand. BikeShare was very popular and did not have any major problems with theft or loss, but without a secure source of funding it was not possible to operate. Other bike sharing systems were evolving to reduce the operating overhead as well as find other sources of funding.
A similar system was set up in Rotterdam. It took the approach of simply releasing a number of bicycles to the streets for unrestricted use.
These programs also prevent theft by requiring users to purchase subscriptions with a credit card or debit card (this option requiring a large, temporary deposit) and by equipping the bike with complex anti-theft and bike maintenance sensors. In some cases, such as a university campus, the bicycles are only designated for use within certain boundaries.
Since then many community projects around the country have attempted similar models and met with varying degrees of success. Madison, Wisconsin, for instance, had a program where specific bicycles, always painted red, were available for the use of anyone coming across them on the street (especially used on State Street between the UW campus and the capitol). Most bicycle sharing systems have been undertaken by community groups, public agencies or by public-private partnerships.
Most of the systems have bicycles available at unattended urban locations; and they operate in a manner that could be seen as bicycle transit . If desired, billing can be done directly to the user s mobile phone account.
However, for years community groups have promoted bicycle sharing as an easily accessible alternative to motorized travel, hoping to reduce the carbon footprint of commuting as well as enable residents to become healthier through exercise. Bicycle sharing systems can be divided into two general categories: Community Bike programs organized mostly by local community groups or non-profit organizations; and Smart Bike programs implemented by municipalities or through public-private partnerships, as in the case of Paris Vélib’ program. This so-called White Bicycle Plan provided free bicycles that were supposed to be used for one trip and then left for someone else.
Thus, one bike may take 10-15 rides a day with different users and can be ridden up to 10,000 km (6000 miles) a year (this figure from the city of Lyon, France). Copenhagen has 2500 bikes which cannot be used outside the 9 km² zone of the city centre (a fine of DKr 1000 applies to any user taking bikes across the canal bridges around the periphery.
Some other programs are not linked to an advertising deal, for example Smoove with Vélomagg in Montpellier and Vélopop in Avignon, Valence and Saint-Étienne, but can be financed by public support. Sometimes known as Bike Library models, these bicycles may be given free of charge, for a refundable deposit, or sold at a reduced price. In many schemes the first half hour is free.
Within a month, most of the bikes had been stolen and the rest were found in nearby canals. In one program tried in 1993 in Cambridge, United Kingdom, the overwhelming majority of the fleet of 300 bicycles were stolen, and the program was abandoned. A small cash deposit releases the bike from a locked terminal and can only be retrieved by returning it to another.
Bikeabout, launched in 1996 by Portsmouth, UK, included cards with magnetic stripes that the students would swipe to sign out a bike. The individual is responsible for the bike until it is returned to another hub. Many of the membership programs are being operated through public-private partnerships.
The first system of this generation was Copenhagen s ByCyklen - City Bikes, launched 1995. In these regards they resemble carsharing. There are many ways to provide community bicycles, but most programs are loosely based around one of the following designs: In this type of program the bicycles are simply released into a city or given area.
They are assigned to one person who will typically keep the bike for months or years and lock it between uses. In return, the agencies are allowed to advertise both on the bikes themselves and in other select locations in the city.
This model of community bike has spread to many other cities. Bike sharing programs: The next innovation was to use smart cards. It is regarded as one of the first successful bike sharing programs. One of the first community bicycle projects in the United States was started in Portland, Oregon in 1994 by civic and environmental activists Tom O Keefe, Joe Keating and Steve Gunther.
A bike unfriendly city prior to the launch of Velo v in 2005, Lyon saw an increase of 500% in bicycle trips, a quarter of which were due to the bike sharing system. A Library Bike in a person s possession can be chosen for some trips instead of a car, thus lowering car usage.
Research also reveals that for many major London rail stations an unknown number of the bikes parked are used only a couple of times per week, and the potential to replace these with hire bikes is widely ignored by UK rail operators. London mayor Boris Johnson has said that a city-wide bicycle sharing system modelled on the Paris Velib system will be introduced in London in May 2010. Images of bicycle rental and free bike schemes can be seen with their location data on the photomap of CycleStreets. Many of the community-run bicycle programs paint each bicycle yellow, white, or another solid colour. Since Paris Velib program operates with an increasing fee past the free first half hour, users have a strong disincentive of taking the bicycles out of the city centre. North America has been slower to embrace bike sharing systems as compared to Europe. As of 2009 the following systems are operating in North America: Below are North American cities that have conducted and or begun a Feasibility Study, Released an RFI, Released an RFP or publicly announced their exploration of the subject: Road cycling · Segregated cycle facilities · Vehicular cycling · Bicycle commuting .
This was the first large-scale urban bike share program featuring specially-designed bikes with parts that could not be used on other bikes. The bicycle can be checked out like a library book, a liability waiver can be collected at check out, and the bike can be returned anytime.
He then receives a number code that opens the lock. Since the deposit (usually one or more coins) is a fraction of the bike s cost, this does little to deter theft. In this version of the program, bicycles are kept either at volunteer-run hubs or at self-service terminals throughout the city.
The program is still active in some parts of the Netherlands (the Hoge Veluwe National Park; bikes have to stay inside the park). If the bike is not returned within the subscription period, or returned with significant damage, the bike sharing operator withdraws money from the user s credit card account.
A number of bicycles is made available for shared use by individuals who do not own any of the bicycles. The reasons for implementing bicycle sharing systems are as numerous as the forms the systems take. First, as a fleet of coloured bicycles begin to appear around the city, it helps to get the word out about the program.
It originally existed as one in a series of White Plans proposed in the street magazine produced by the anarchist group PROVO. In 2000 Schimmelpenninck admitted that the Sixties experiment never existed in the way people believe , that no more than about ten bikes had been put out on the street as a suggestion of the bigger idea , but the police confiscated the bicycles within a day. In 1974 the French city of La Rochelle launched a free bike program featuring yellow bicycles that were free to take and use. Vélib’, in turn, followed Lyon s Vélo v success and is now considered the largest system of its kind in the world.
Bicycle sharing systems (also known as: community bicycle programs, yellow bicycle programs, white bicycle programs, public bikes, or free bikes) are increasingly popular and diverse. Bike sharing has spread to many other European cities and is currently enjoying surging popularity in North America.
The only rule regarding their use was that they were always to remain outside and unlocked for any passerby to use. Two of more prominent launches have been a small program started in Washington D.C., and a much larger program, called Bixi, launched in Montreal in the spring of 2009. Montreal s Bixi program became North America s largest bike sharing system in May 2009.
Like Berlin s Call-a-Bike, OYBike uses mobile phone technology to log use and charge for hires and can set up hire points in as little as 10 minutes. Portland s Yellow Bike Project was an amazing publicity success, but proved unsustainable initially due to theft and vandalism of the bicycles.
See OV Fiets for more information (in Dutch with English summary) or Call a Bike in Germany . In some German cities, the national rail company Deutsche Bahn offers a convenient bike rental service: Call a Bike . In return, the bikes carry advertisements, which appear on the bike frame and the solid-disk type wheels.
After initial online registration, a potential user can phone a number printed on the bike. Many of the business users can reclaim the cost of leasing bikes and hire points as part of a workplace cycling scheme or green travel plan.
Riders pay a refundable deposit at one of 100 special bike stands and have unlimited use of a bike within a specified area. Users are expected to leave the bike unlocked in a public area once they reach their destination. Bicycle sharing programs without user electronic identification struggle against theft and vandalism.
Some are seen as a distinct break, having grown out of free community bicycle programs. The central concept of many of the systems is free or affordable access to bicycles for city transport to reduce the use of automobiles for short trips inside the city thereby diminishing traffic congestion, noise and air-pollution. Although users of such systems generally pay to use vehicles that they themselves do not own, sharing systems differ from traditional bike rental.
This is helpful in deterring theft since the painted bicycle has little resale value. Large scale bike sharing programs, however, have designed their own bike with singular designs of frame and other parts to prevent disassembly and resale of stolen parts. Another advantage of bike sharing systems is that the smart cards allow the bikes to be returned to any station in the system, which facilitates one-way rides to work, education or shopping centres. The hubs were located at stores, cafes and community centres where the staff would volunteer their time to sign bikes out and in.
The Call a Bike principle is very simple, the bikes are locked electronically and again left in the open at widely distributed locations. This is usually done for two primary reasons.
Most require a user to become a member, and do not cater to tourists, shoppers, or other casual users. This program (called Red Bikes) has since been modified to include deposits for the bicycle and a lock and is only available from spring (when all snow has melted) to November 30. A similar program, BikeShare, operated by the Community Bicycle Network (CBN) in Toronto from 2001 to 2006, was North America s most successful community bicycle system, but has paled in comparison with the launches of the large-scale systems Washington, D.C. s SmartBikes and Montreal s BIXI.
A disadvantage of this model is the much lower using frequency, around three uses per day as compared to between 10 to 15 uses per day with other bike sharing models. Advantages of long term use, include a familiarity the rider gets with their bicycle, a mode of travel that is ready for the borrower at any time during the months of use. The more recent Stuttgart operation requires bikes to be returned to defined locations as the users choice of places to leave bikes off-hire can occasionally provide an opportunity to hide a bike for a return trip.
The program was later revised to operate under a more restrictive system. BikeShare was designed to attempt to overcome some of the theft issues by requiring yearly memberships to sign out any of the 150 refurbished bikes locked up at 16 hubs throughout central Toronto.
Recently and most notably, municipal governments have promoted systems as part of intermodal transportation, allowing people to shift easily from other forms of transport to bicycle and back again.
